mg/qmk_sweep_skeletyl
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

pointing_device: motion pin define and c-format weirdness (#22802)

Browse source 
the mutual exclusive POINTING_DEVICE_MOTION_PIN and SPLIT_POINTING_ENABLE influence if and how the `pointing_device_driver.get_report` is triggered. now the way the define is wrapping around an "unbraced" if leads clang-format to weirdly indent the first line in the 'SPLIT_POINTING_ENABLE' as the first command after the if.

this hints that any code addition in between the two - that possibly should run regardless, would break the if-def enabled code.

this can be solved by adding a pair of curly braces in the POINTING_DEVICE_MOTION_PIN part, to clearly denote which commands are to be skipped if the motion pin shows now activity.

Co-authored-by: Johannes <you@example.com>
This commit is contained in:
JohSchneider 2024-01-10 16:38:13 +00:00 committed by GitHub
parent 41948350e8
commit d9b1ab9ae0
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 8 additions and 3 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

5
quantum/pointing_device/pointing_device.c
View file

@ -251,6 +251,7 @@ __attribute__((weak)) bool pointing_device_task(void) {
# else
if (readPin(POINTING_DEVICE_MOTION_PIN))
# endif
{
#endif
#if defined(SPLIT_POINTING_ENABLE)
@ -268,6 +269,10 @@ __attribute__((weak)) bool pointing_device_task(void) {
local_mouse_report = pointing_device_driver.get_report(local_mouse_report);
#endif // defined(SPLIT_POINTING_ENABLE)
#ifdef POINTING_DEVICE_MOTION_PIN
}
#endif
// allow kb to intercept and modify report
#if defined(SPLIT_POINTING_ENABLE) && defined(POINTING_DEVICE_COMBINED)
if (is_keyboard_left()) {